New Videos Released Explaining the Math and Physics of Time Travel

Time Travel Theory Explained (click below)
At long last, I have completed a labor of several months to present seven short and easy to understand videos that will easily explain the simple math and physics demonstrating that time travel is within the boundaries of ordinary science. While these are designed for the layman, scientists and mathematicians will also benefit from the laser simplicity of what is presented.

Click on the above and you will be linked to an introductory video. Click on the button that says “Access Free Videos”. After you enter your name and email, you will be sent a link to where you can access a new website where these videos can be seen; and where you will also be able to access other videos and material that will be circulated from time to time.

You will also be placed on an email list for future releases that will give you opportunities for new and unparalleled learning.

Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | Comments Off on New Videos Released Explaining the Math and Physics of Time Travel

Time Travel Webinar January 3rd

TIME TRAVEL WEBINAR (scheduled now for Jan 3, 2016) I will be participating in a webinar on the subject of TIME TRAVEL with Andrew Bartziz, Douglas Duane Dietrich and Laura Lee Solomon You will hear some things you have not heard before. To sign up:

Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | Comments Off on Time Travel Webinar January 3rd

Time Travel Videos

I have been very occupied producing educational videos on the math and physics behind time travel. It is similar to the newsletter of last summer that I wrote but it is more detailed and visual; and will take less effort to understand. I will release them via a new web vehicle very soon. They are free of charge.

Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | Comments Off on Time Travel Videos

Peter Moon Lecture (tonight) August 7th on Long Island

Peter Moon will be lecturing tonight at 8pm (EDT) at Levittown Hall on Long Island, hosted by The Eyes of Learning:

Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | Comments Off on Peter Moon Lecture (tonight) August 7th on Long Island

Particle Accelerator in Transylvania

In May of 2014, I went on a special adventure to Transylvania during which I was to visit the magical Valley of the Golden Thrones which is the most enigmatic and interesting area in Romania (that feature very tight security). To my surprise my visit was coincident with the arrival of the Vice President of the U.S. and the CIA director who were there to pen up the world’s largest particle accelerator (this is discussed in the Summer 2014 issue of the Montauk Pulse newsletter. At long last, I have been forwarded the first news item that suggests the particle accelerator in Transylvania MIGHT be doing. (link is below) I logged into the site in an attempt to respond to the false information in the comments but the architecture of the site would not allow comment. One of the commenters, Ramura, states that he does not “put a lot of credibility around Peter Moon” after previously stating that Dr. David Anderson (according to “Transylvanian Sunrise” and sequels) discovered a time capsule in Romania. THIS IS SO STUPID! David never claimed to discover a time capsule there nor does the book say so. Seems people who doubt or refute me in this case cannot even present data straight and are VERY confused in what they assert. He gets a response from “Lost” that says “Always good to question if the Montauk types are saying “we’re in on this.” Well…I was going to Romania many times before the particle accelerator was built, and it is true that when I went in May 2014, I arrived just before the Vice President (who opened the accelerator) of the USA as well as an unprecedented huge storm; and it is true that one of my main friends was in charge of security for this endeavor; but THIS IS ALL COINCIDENCE. I was not “in on” anything that was going on. Certain energetic comments were made by my Romanians friends, but this is just observations and speculative ones. Also, Ramura is surprised David has not sued me for using his name. There is a built in rejection factor which is not unique to him. He should listen to my podcast with David Anderson. These real problem here is that people do not often listen and assimilate data in a fashion that is logical. I don’t know that anything said in the article is true that is presented by Joseph Farrell or if it is some sort of advanced damage control, but it is noteworthy if only for the reasons stated above. It would be nice to have more real information on the TPA (Transylvanian Particle Accelerator).

Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | 4 Comments

Interview with Dr. David Anderson is finally here!!!!!!! (Peter Moon Podcast #8)

Here is the long awaited interview with Dr. David Anderson in six segments (we spoke for about 4 hours, breaks included) that were conducted on June 13, 2015. Once again, it is highly recommended that you listen to Podcast #7 first so that you are familiar with Dr. Anderson and what he is talking about, particularly Podcast #7, Part 3 wherein Light Cones and Closed Timelike Curves are explained. We have also added additional music by Noosa to the fadeouts at the end of each segment. At the end of Segment 3 or PART THREE, you will also hear the full rendition of Noosa’s most popular and best selling song “Walk on By” which is followed by a short interview with Noosa’s lead singer and composer, Sky.

Peter Moon Podcast #8 Interview with Dr. David Anderson (PART ONE)

Peter Moon Podcast #8 Interview with Dr. David Anderson (PART TWO)

Peter Moon Podcast #8 Interview with Dr. David Anderson (PART THREE)

Peter Moon Podcast #8 Interview with Dr. David Anderson (PART FOUR)

Peter Moon Podcast #8 Interview with Dr. David Anderson (PART FIVE)

Peter Moon Podcast #8 Interview with Dr. David Anderson (PART SIX)

Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | 3 Comments

Follow-up from Ivanheim on U-boat articles

Here is a follow-up from Ivanheim with regard to the U-boat articles he supplied. I hope to read his books at some point. Follow-up comments:

No criticism was intended of yourself for the Bernhard item of course. As authors we do rely on other authors to state facts accurately, particularly if they offer eyewitness accounts.

When U-530 put into Mar del Plata, no less than 37 of the non-officer grades had jettisoned their identity documents and assumed false names to declare to the Argentine authorities. I imagine that these would have been the crew members with special knowledge of the materials aboard U-530, or maybe replacements for fatalities after the spillage to hush the whole thing up.

From the evidence it seems that Otto Wermuth was replaced on 9 July 1945 by an imposter commander who brought the boat into Mar del Plata. From the photographs, Wermuth was short and dark, the official plant was tall, blond and Nordic looking. The identity of the plant has never been established, but from his major decorations, and what he told the Argentine Press on 10-12 July 1945, he was an experienced naval man aboard both warships and U-boats. Since Bernhard claimed to have joined the German Navy in 1943, it does not seem likely that he could have been the plant.

I have not read the two books you mention but I collaborate closely with the Sharkhunters on-line organisation which recently published two books, “The Secret Alliance” (between Argentina and Hitler’s Germany) this one authored by myself, and “Hitler in Argentina” which provides pretty convincing evidence from official sources that Hitler and Eva Braun did come to Argentina postwar. Forensic facial analysis proves that Hitler had a remarkable double in place from March 1945, and he was probably absent from the Reich Chancellery after 23 April 1945, the date when he signed his last Führer-order, after which the double became nominal Führer for seven days .

Thank you for posting my U-530 material so promptly.

Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | Comments Off on Follow-up from Ivanheim on U-boat articles

Article 4 – “Was there ever a “Captain Wilhem Bernard” aboard U-530?” by Ivinheim

Note from Peter Moon. Wilhelm Bernard was a pseudonym. He appeared in the works of Howard A. Buechner, who wrote “Adolf Hitler and the Holy Lance” and “Hitler’s Ashes” who identified this as a pseudonym. Before dismissing “Captain Bernard’s” written testimony, it would be best to review the source material. According to Wiki, the U-530 surrounded on 10 July 1945. The phrases “from when he served aboard U-530 until the boat surrendered” and was “scuttled off the coast of Mar del Plata on 10 July 1945” at first look appear to be careless reporting because 10 July was the date of the surrendering. It is not likely the ship surrendered and then was scuttled on the same day. This could be an error of the writer who was most definitely an arbitrary intermediary between “Captain Bernhard” and what found its way into print. Writers make mistakes frequently.


The Black Sun at pages 116 and 121 mentions books authored jointly by Colonel Howard Buechner and a German “Captain”, Wilhelm Bernhard, who is alleged to have “served aboard U-530 on her final voyage”. The immediate problem with “Captain Wilhelm Berhard” is that he does not appear on the U-530 crew list.

U-530 had a crew of 54 men. The five officers were the commander Otto Wermuth together with Karl-Felix Schuller, Karl Heinz Lenz, Peter Leffler, and Gregor Schlüter, all interrogated by the Argentine Navy and the US Navy later. The rest of the crew was made up of 18 NCO’s and 31 ratings.

“Captain” (of what?) Bernhard says he joined the German Navy in 1943 and was “assigned to the U-boat Service”. He would then have undergone training until August 1944 “from when he served aboard U-530 until the boat surrendered” and was “scuttled off the coast of Mar del Plata on 10 July 1945.”

Bernhard has such a remarkable memory that he recalls U-530 being scuttled at Mar del Plata on 10 July 1945, even though U-530 was taken afloat to the United States in August 1945 for close examination there, together with the crew, of which he obviously claims to have been one, before being scuttled months afterwards off the US coast.

Therefore it is fair to conclude that “Captian Wilhelm Bernhard”, if he ever existed was never aboard U-530, and one wonders what purpose it served to claim to have been so.


Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | Comments Off on Article 4 – “Was there ever a “Captain Wilhem Bernard” aboard U-530?” by Ivinheim

Peter Moon Podcast #7 concerning time control scientist, Dr. David Anderson

On June 13th, I conducted a 3 hour plus long interview with Dr. David Anderson (which will be Podcast #8). This is the first time he has spoken publicly in years. It will be released within a week or so. The following podcast (#7) is a pre-requisit to listening to Podcast #8. I have done podcast #7 so that I will not up valuable time of the interview with discussing his background and earlier adventures, all of which have been covered in previous interviews he has done with either others or myself. Most important are Parts Three and Four with regard to the discussion of Light Cones and Closed Timelike Curves which I have explained in a very easy to understand way. The discussion of Light Cones and Closed Timelike Curves has also been made easier to understand by a new edition of the Montauk Pulse newsletter (Summer 2015).

Peer Moon Podcast #7 on time control scientist Dr. David Anderson (PART ONE)

Peer Moon Podcast #7 on time control scientist Dr. David Anderson (PART TWO)

Peer Moon Podcast #7 on time control scientist Dr. David Anderson (PART THREE)

Peer Moon Podcast #7 on time control scientist Dr. David Anderson (PART FOUR)

Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | Comments Off on Peter Moon Podcast #7 concerning time control scientist, Dr. David Anderson

Article 3 – The Horror Voyage of U-530 by Ivinheim

Here is the third article in this series. We are expecting a fourth article very soon.

Article 3


According to the declassified Argentine/US interrogation reports(1), U-530 sailed from Kiel on 19 February 1945 and left Oslo for the Unites States coast on 5 March 1945. Oblt Wermuth met up briefly with U-853 in mid-April although the purpose of this meeting is unknown.

Wermuth apparently had orders to operate off New York. U-530 carried two short-wave receivers, one all-frequency and one radione receiver. Wermuth thought that one of the short-wave receivers might be damaged but the others were in good order. While in his area of operations he was to follow procedure and not transmit except for the daily weather reports. His last contact with Berlin was on 26 April, but at the end of April close to Long Island he entered a mysterious “radio dead zone” where not even the coastal radio stations could be heard and the boat remained cloaked in total radio silence “until 8th or 10 May”. Interference was also caused to other electronic equipment. Because both U-853 and U-530 continued hostilities contrary to orders issued by Dönitz on 4 May, it is obvious that both boats suffered a long-term radio blackout following their presence off Long Island.

At some time before 4 May 1945, U-530 was in US territorial waters where Wermuth “allowed all crew members to view New York through the periscope”. Fifty-four men went one by one to the periscope and each saw “very clearly skyscrapers, trains and cars, and dirigibles of the coastal defence overhead(2)”. Never during all this sightseeing was there a fear that the periscope might be detected by those dirigibles overhead whose only purpose in being there was to scour the coastal waters looking for U-boat periscopes: and nor was there a fear that it might be spotted by radar. Another boat with similar orders was U-977 which had orders to enter the British port of Southampton “and sink shipping there”(3). This dangerous activity in May 1945 would have required both boats to be invisible.

The LUT torpedo was almost infallible. It ran loops either side of a mean course and also had an acoustic guidance system. The FAT did not have the latter but was generally very effective. On 4 May, Wermuth said that U-530 attacked a convoy of up to twenty ships in fog. One LUT stuck in the tube, the other two failed. On 6 May U-530 fired two LUTs which failed against a large convoy. Then a LUT missed a tanker and a FAT missed a straggler. On 7 May two FATs failed against another large convoy. No convoys reported being attacked by a U-boat during this period.

At this point Wermuth jettisoned the five remaining torpedoes as “being in a condition to explode”. He refrained from stating what condition they were in. The only reasonable theory for the U-530 radio total dead zone and the torpedo failures is that some weapon or equipment aboard, possibly a “miracle weapon rocket”, had an electro-magnetic basis which proved susceptible to a ray or beam while off Long Island.

Once Wermuth suspected a leak he had to act fast. If the leak was combining with the torpedo warheads to bring them to a condition where they were likely to explode, deck gun, torpedoes, flak, all munitions and anything else which might be tainted with a residual trace had to be thrown overboard at once. Because radon gas is notoriously difficult to contain, the entire outer structure of the boat would have to be scrubbed repeatedly with the virulent corrosive cleaner carried aboard no doubt just for that purpose.

After radio contact with the outside world was restored on the 8th or 10 May, U-530 headed to the waters 1000 sea miles ENE of Puerto Rico. Here lies the Sargasso Sea and the Doldrums with little wind or swell, ideal for work scrubbing the boat with corrosive cleaner, jettisoning the remaining weapons and ammunition, burning contaminated materials and taking stock for the run to Argentina. Wermuth then set course to the south, crossing the Equator on 16 June 1945 and maintaining a slow speed until 20ºS, the men living on distilled seawater and having no food because the leak had poisoned the provisions.

Wermuth told the Argentine naval interrogators that he saw the Punta Mogotes light at Mar del Plata at 0300 hrs on 9 July 1945 from 18 miles offshore and went down the coast to Miramar arriving there at 0600 hrs on 9 July. “At nightfall on 9 July I surfaced and made my way eastwards back along the coast keeping three miles offshore until reaching Mar del Plata submarine base where I drifted until the early hours”(2). The US Naval Attaché did not want this jaunt to Miramar published and so falsified his translation from the Spanish to read: “Wermuth told the Argentines of first sighting the Mogotes light at 0300 hrs on 10 July, thought about going to Miramar to surrender and then he submerged and waited for dawn to view the port of Mar del Plata(1).”

Why did Wermuth go to Miramar? “At the end of 1943, Generalmajor Friedrich Wolf, naval attaché at the German Embassy, had arranged with Gustav Eickenberg, a German-Bolivian tin magnate who had a ranch at Mar del Sur, to use it as an Etappendienst station for disembarkations from U-boats. The best spot for the arrival of a U-boat was equidistant between the lighthouses at Miramar and Necochea, where a path led up to Eickenberg’s ranch(4).”

The probability is that Wermuth got off the boat at Miramar. Here the containers of cash, jewels and travellers’ cheques(5) were unloaded and he took with him the U-530 log, charts and books for the conference with German naval intelligence officers of the Etappendienst. In the final article, the U-530 game of musical chairs in which most crewmen lost their ID documents and adopted an alias, and the Germans surrendered an empty boat.

“U-530 appeared to have survived some dreadful calamity. The great rusty hull, its paintwork shredded and peeling, contrasted vividly with the smart, steely grey, small Argentine submarines at the base. The decking was very corroded and had been the seat of a major fire. The conning tower had cracked and was falling apart…the interior was covered with mould.” Colonel Bustos was appalled by the “vile nauseating stench in the interior despite the boat having been aired for three days”, by the “haggard and exhausted appearance of the crew” and to cap it all, for the first time in the history of the German U-boat Arm, a submarine had arrived in port with its provisions lockers almost full but the crew suffering from scurvy. The worst afflicted were “put on a diet of boiled potatoes and lemons(6).”


(1) See the declassified US Navy Report, Report on Interrogation of Prisoners Surrendered at Mar del Plata on 10 July 1945, item US Naval Attaché Buenos Aires, Observation of Argentine Navy Interrogation of Prisoners from U-530-Interrogation of Oberleutnant Otto Wermuth:
(2) Salinas & De Napoli, Utramar Sur, p.401 and 424: Helmut Kraft: Submarinos alemanes en la Argentina, Buenos Aires 1998.
(3) Schaeffer, Heinz: In his interrogation at Mar del Plata on 20 August 1945, Schaeffer offered to show the Argentine interrogators his written orders for Southampton.
(4) Ecos Diarios, Necochea, 22.2.1944 quoted in Jorge Camarasa, Puerto Seguro, Buenos Aires 2006, p.63. The Miramar zone was very important for German naval planning and with the tacit cooperation of the Argentines was the centre for a major disembarkation from two U-boats on the night of 27 July 1945 to another German ranch near Necochea known as Moromar.
(5) These clandestine deliveries to Argentina by U-boat were fairly commonplace during 1945. See the article by Deuxième Bureau agent Alain Pujol, Le Figaro, 1 September 1970. 
(6) Bustos, Yo fuí testigo, op cit.
Author’s Note: Final Article follows.

Posted in The Montauk Project Blog | Comments Off on Article 3 – The Horror Voyage of U-530 by Ivinheim